<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<codeBook version="1.2.2" ID="TCD-MOPH-SARA-2015-vFINAL" xml-lang="en" xmlns="http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI/Version1-2-2.xsd">
<docDscr>
  <citation>
    <titlStmt>
      <IDNo>DDI-TCD-SARA-2015-vFINAL</IDNo>
    </titlStmt>
    <prodStmt>
      <producer abbr="WHO" affiliation="" role="Documentation of assessment">World Health Organization</producer>
      <prodDate date="2021-12-10">2021-12-10</prodDate>
      <software version="v5">NADA</software>
    </prodStmt>
    <verStmt>
      <version>Final version (2016)</version>
    </verStmt>
  </citation>
</docDscr>
<stdyDscr>
  <citation>
    <titlStmt>
      <titl>Indice de Disponibilité et de Capacité Opérationnelle des Services de Santé (SARA) Chad 2015</titl>
      <subTitl/>
      <altTitl/>
      <parTitl>Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) Chad 2015</parTitl>
      <IDNo>TCD-MOPH-SARA-2015-vFINAL</IDNo>
    </titlStmt>
    <rspStmt>
      <AuthEnty affiliation="">Ministry of Public Health</AuthEnty>
    </rspStmt>
    <prodStmt>
      <producer abbr="" affiliation="" role="Technical support">World Health Organization</producer>
      <copyright/>
      <software version="5.0" date="2023-05-27">NADA</software>
      <grantNo/>
    </prodStmt>
    <distStmt>
      <depDate date=""/>
      <distDate date=""/>
    </distStmt>
    <serStmt>
      <serName>Service Availability and Readiness Assessment [hfa/sara]</serName>
      <serInfo/>
    </serStmt>
    <verStmt>
      <version date="2015-12-31">Final report (2015)</version>
      <verResp/>
      <notes/>
    </verStmt>
    <biblCit format=""/>
    <notes/>
  </citation>
  <stdyInfo>
    <studyBudget/>
    <subject>
                  
                  
    </subject>
    <abstract>The Ministry of Public Health in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) implemented the 2015 Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) for Chad. The 2015 SARA aimed to generate reliable and regular information on the availability of health services (the availability of infrastructure, essential human resources) and the operational capacity of health facilities to deliver basic family planning interventions, pediatric health services, essential and comprehensive obstetric care, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and non-communicable diseases. 

The survey covered 332 health facilities across the country. 

This report covers three categories of indicators:

1. General service availability
• Health infrastructure density
• Health workforce density
• Service utilization

2. General service readiness
• Basic amenities and comfort elements
• Basic equipment
• Standard precautions for infection prevention
• Diagnostic capacity
• Essential medicines

3. Service specific availability and readiness
• Family planning
• Antenatal care
• Obstetric care
• Neonatal care
• Preventive and curative care services for the child
• Adolescent health services
• Malaria 
• HIV/AIDS counselling and testing services
• Tuberculosis
• HIV/AIDS care and support services
• Prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV
• Sexually transmitted infections
• Malaria
• Tuberculosis 
• Non-communicable diseases
• Basic surgical services
• Comprehensive surgical services
• Advanced diagnostic services</abstract>
    <sumDscr>
      <collDate date="2015-05-17" event="start" cycle=""/>
      <collDate date="2015-06-15" event="end" cycle=""/>
      <nation abbr="TCD">Chad</nation>
      <geogCover>Nationally representative as well as representative at district level</geogCover>
      <geogUnit/>
      <anlyUnit>Health facilities</anlyUnit>
      <universe>The survey covered 332 health facilities</universe>
      <dataKind>Sample survey data [ssd]</dataKind>
    </sumDscr>
    <!-- qualityStatement - ddi2.5 - complex type
     
     This structure consists of two parts, standardsCompliance and otherQualityStatements. 
     In standardsCompliance list all specific standards complied with during the execution of this 
     study. Note the standard name and producer and how the study complied with the standard. 
     Enter any additional quality statements in otherQualityStatements.
     
     -->
    <qualityStatement>
      <standardsCompliance>
        <standard>
          <standardName/>
          <producer/>
        </standard>
        <complianceDescription/>
      </standardsCompliance>
      <otherQualityStatement/>
    </qualityStatement>
    <notes>The SARA survey is designed to generate a set of core indicators on key inputs and outputs of the health system, which can be used to measure progress in health system strengthening over time. The SARA focuses on three main areas: service availability, general service readiness and service-specific readiness.

A basic approach to SARA is to collect data that are comparable both across countries and within countries (i.e. across regions and/or districts) using a standard core questionnaire developed by WHO in collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Usually, a country adopts the standard core questionnaire with adaptations to certain elements such as types of facilities, managing authority of facilities, national guidelines for services, staffing categories and national policies for medicines (e.g. for tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS). The SARA survey requires visits to health facilities with data collection based on key informant interviews and observation of key items. The survey can either be carried out as a sample or a census; the choice between these methodologies will depend on a number of elements including the country's resources, the objectives of the survey and the availability of a master facility list (MFL).</notes>
    <!-- exPostEvaluation ddi2.5
      Use this section to describe evaluation procedures not address in data evaluation processes. 
      These may include issues such as timing of the study, sequencing issues, cost/budget issues, 
      relevance, instituional or legal arrangments etc. of the study. 
      
      The completionDate attribute holds the date the evaluation was completed. 
      The type attribute is an optional type to identify the type of evaluation with or without 
      the use of a controlled vocabulary.
    -->
    <exPostEvaluation completionDate="" type="">
      <evaluationProcess/>
      <outcomes/>
    </exPostEvaluation>
  </stdyInfo>
  <method>
    <dataColl>
      <timeMeth/>
      <!-- collectorTraining - DDI2.5
        
        Collector Training

        Describes the training provided to data collectors including internviewer training, process testing, 
        compliance with standards etc. This is repeatable for language and to capture different aspects of the 
        training process. The type attribute allows specification of the type of training being described.
        
        -->
      <collectorTraining type=""/>
      <frequenc/>
      <sampProc>A national sample of 333 facilities was drawn from a sampling frame of 1,571 health facilities in the Health Information System database, representing 20% of the facilities. Stratified sampling was used to select the health facilities. The strata were grouped by facility type, management authority, and location.</sampProc>
      <sampleFrame>
        <sampleFrameName/>
        <custodian/>
        <universe/>
        <frameUnit isPrimary="">
          <unitType numberOfUnits=""/>
        </frameUnit>
        <updateProcedure/>
      </sampleFrame>
      <deviat/>
      <collMode>Face-to-face [f2f]</collMode>
      <resInstru>The SARA core questionnaires overview is as follows:
Section 1: Cover page
Section 2: Staffing
Section 3: Inpatient and observation beds
Section 4: Infrastructure
Section 5: Available services
Section 6: Diagnostics
Section 7: Medicines and commodities
Section 8: Interviewers observations</resInstru>
      <!-- instrumentDevelopment - DDI2.5             
        Describe any development work on the data collection instrument. Type attribute allows for the optional use of a defined development type with or without use of a controlled vocabulary.
        -->
      <instrumentDevelopment type=""/>
      <collSitu/>
      <actMin/>
      <ConOps/>
      <weight/>
      <cleanOps/>
    </dataColl>
    <notes/>
    <anlyInfo>
      <respRate/>
      <EstSmpErr/>
      <dataAppr/>
    </anlyInfo>
    <stdyClas/>
    <dataProcessing type=""/>
    <codingInstructions relatedProcesses="" type="">
      <txt/>
      <command formalLanguage=""/>
    </codingInstructions>
  </method>
  <dataAccs>
    <setAvail>
      <accsPlac URI=""/>
      <origArch/>
      <avlStatus/>
      <collSize/>
      <complete/>
      <fileQnty/>
      <notes/>
    </setAvail>
    <useStmt>
      <restrctn/>
      <citReq/>
      <deposReq/>
      <conditions/>
      <disclaimer/>
    </useStmt>
    <notes/>
  </dataAccs>
  <notes/>
</stdyDscr>
<dataDscr>
</dataDscr></codeBook>
