<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<codeBook version="1.2.2" ID="BFA-MOH-SARA-2014-vFINAL" xml-lang="en" xmlns="http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI/Version1-2-2.xsd">
<docDscr>
  <citation>
    <titlStmt>
      <IDNo>DDI-BFA-SARA-2014-vFINAL</IDNo>
    </titlStmt>
    <prodStmt>
      <producer abbr="WHO" affiliation="" role="Documentation of Assessment">World Health Organization</producer>
      <prodDate date="2021-12-09">2021-12-09</prodDate>
      <software version="v5">NADA</software>
    </prodStmt>
    <verStmt>
      <version>Final version (report)</version>
    </verStmt>
  </citation>
</docDscr>
<stdyDscr>
  <citation>
    <titlStmt>
      <titl>Enquete Nationale sur les Prestations des Services de Sante et la Qualite des Donnees Sanitaires (EN-PSQD/SARA II) Burkina Faso 2014</titl>
      <subTitl/>
      <altTitl/>
      <parTitl>National Survey on Health Services and Quality of Health (EN-PSQD/SARA II)</parTitl>
      <IDNo>BFA-MOH-SARA-2014-vFINAL</IDNo>
    </titlStmt>
    <rspStmt>
      <AuthEnty affiliation="">Ministry of Health</AuthEnty>
    </rspStmt>
    <prodStmt>
      <producer abbr="" affiliation="" role="Co-investigator">General Directorate of Health Information  and Health Statistics</producer>
      <producer abbr="" affiliation="" role="Co-investigator">General Secretariat</producer>
      <producer abbr="" affiliation="" role="Co-investigator">World Health Organization</producer>
      <copyright/>
      <software version="5.0" date="2023-05-27">NADA</software>
      <fundAg abbr="WHO" role="Provided financial support">World Health Organization</fundAg>
      <fundAg abbr="" role="Provided financial support">The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria</fundAg>
      <grantNo/>
    </prodStmt>
    <distStmt>
      <depDate date=""/>
      <distDate date=""/>
    </distStmt>
    <serStmt>
      <serName>Service Availability and Readiness Assessment Survey [HFA/SARA]</serName>
      <serInfo/>
    </serStmt>
    <verStmt>
      <version date="2014-12-01">Final report</version>
      <verResp/>
      <notes/>
    </verStmt>
    <biblCit format=""/>
    <notes/>
  </citation>
  <stdyInfo>
    <studyBudget/>
    <subject>
                  
                  
    </subject>
    <abstract>The Burkina Faso Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) was implemented by the Ministry of Health in collaboration with World Health Organization (WHO) in 2014. The SARA survey aimed to assess the availability of services and operational capacity of health facilities to provide them. Specifically, the survey's objectives were to: evaluate the availability of services in the health facilities; measure the availability of basic equipment; assess the availability of drugs and other medical products; assess the availability of treatment guidelines and diagnostic tools; assess the operational capacity of health facilities to provide specific health services such as child health, reproductive health, malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS; and evaluate the quality of data in the National Health Information System (SNIS). 

A census of health facilities was conducted between October and November 2014.  

The SARA survey generated a set of basic indicators on the main inputs and outputs of the health system that can be used to measure progress in strengthening the health system. This report presents findings of a comprehensive analysis with a more detailed description of the SARA and the quality of data in SNIS assessment.</abstract>
    <sumDscr>
      <collDate date="2014-10-13" event="start" cycle=""/>
      <collDate date="2014-11-04" event="end" cycle=""/>
      <nation abbr="BFA">Burkina Faso</nation>
      <geogCover>Representative at national and regional levels</geogCover>
      <geogUnit/>
      <anlyUnit>Health facilities</anlyUnit>
      <universe>The survey covered 780 health facilities across Burkina Faso</universe>
      <dataKind>Sample survey data [ssd]</dataKind>
    </sumDscr>
    <!-- qualityStatement - ddi2.5 - complex type
     
     This structure consists of two parts, standardsCompliance and otherQualityStatements. 
     In standardsCompliance list all specific standards complied with during the execution of this 
     study. Note the standard name and producer and how the study complied with the standard. 
     Enter any additional quality statements in otherQualityStatements.
     
     -->
    <qualityStatement>
      <standardsCompliance>
        <standard>
          <standardName/>
          <producer/>
        </standard>
        <complianceDescription/>
      </standardsCompliance>
      <otherQualityStatement/>
    </qualityStatement>
    <notes>The SARA survey is designed to generate a set of core indicators on key inputs and outputs of the health system, which can be used to measure progress in health system strengthening over time. The SARA focuses on three main areas: service availability, general service readiness and service-specific readiness.

A basic approach to SARA is to collect data that are comparable both across countries and within countries (i.e. across regions and/or districts) using a standard core questionnaire developed by WHO in collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Usually, a country adopts the standard core questionnaire with adaptations to certain elements such as types of facilities, managing authority of facilities, national guidelines for services, staffing categories and national policies for medicines (e.g. for tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS). The SARA survey requires visits to health facilities with data collection based on key informant interviews and observation of key items. The survey can either be carried out as a sample or a census; the choice between these methodologies will depend on a number of elements including the country's resources, the objectives of the survey and the availability of a master facility list (MFL).</notes>
    <!-- exPostEvaluation ddi2.5
      Use this section to describe evaluation procedures not address in data evaluation processes. 
      These may include issues such as timing of the study, sequencing issues, cost/budget issues, 
      relevance, instituional or legal arrangments etc. of the study. 
      
      The completionDate attribute holds the date the evaluation was completed. 
      The type attribute is an optional type to identify the type of evaluation with or without 
      the use of a controlled vocabulary.
    -->
    <exPostEvaluation completionDate="" type="">
      <evaluationProcess/>
      <outcomes/>
    </exPostEvaluation>
  </stdyInfo>
  <method>
    <dataColl>
      <timeMeth/>
      <!-- collectorTraining - DDI2.5
        
        Collector Training

        Describes the training provided to data collectors including internviewer training, process testing, 
        compliance with standards etc. This is repeatable for language and to capture different aspects of the 
        training process. The type attribute allows specification of the type of training being described.
        
        -->
      <collectorTraining type=""/>
      <frequenc/>
      <sampProc>Stratified sampling was used.The first stratum was made up of 3rd level health facilities whereas the second stratum was made up of 2nd level health facilities and the 3rd stratum includes the 1st level health facilities. For the selection of the health facilities to be surveyed, the following steps were taken:
- a census of all the health facilities for first stratum  
- a census of all the health facilities for second stratum  
- a random selection for the health facilities in the third stratum.</sampProc>
      <sampleFrame>
        <sampleFrameName/>
        <custodian/>
        <universe/>
        <frameUnit isPrimary="">
          <unitType numberOfUnits=""/>
        </frameUnit>
        <updateProcedure/>
      </sampleFrame>
      <deviat/>
      <collMode>Face-to-face [f2f]</collMode>
      <resInstru>For this assessment, the WHO SARA Version 2.2 questionnaire of July 2014 was used. It was adapted to the country context in some areas.  
The questionnaire is structured as follows: 
Section 1: Cover page (identification) 
Section 2: Personnel 
Section 3: Inpatient and observation beds 
Section 4: Infrastructure 
Section 5: Available services 
Section 6: Diagnostics 
Section 7: Drugs and other products 
Section 8: Investigator's Comments 

Another questionnaire, the Facility Reported Data Verification Tool version 2.1. was used to assess data quality.  This tool was used to verify the provision of specific services in the health facilities as well as the availability and content of source documents and monthly reports.</resInstru>
      <!-- instrumentDevelopment - DDI2.5             
        Describe any development work on the data collection instrument. Type attribute allows for the optional use of a defined development type with or without use of a controlled vocabulary.
        -->
      <instrumentDevelopment type=""/>
      <collSitu>Training of enumerators and supervisors was conducted before data collection. The survey team comprised of technical statisticians and health epidemiology officers from Center for Health Information and Epidemiological Surveillance (CISSE). A total of 70 enumerators were selected for a 20-day data collection. Each team comprised of two enumerators and a team leader. 

Data collection for SARA 2014 used paper questionnaires. To ensure the quality of the data collected, a counter-survey was conducted where 10% of the health facilities in the sample were revisited.</collSitu>
      <actMin/>
      <ConOps/>
      <weight/>
      <cleanOps>Upon verification and correction in the field by team leaders and survey controllers, the paper-questionnaires were sent to SSD for coding and additional verification before data entry. Data entry and processing was done using a data entry mask designed by WHO on CSPRO (Census and Survey Processing System). After data entry, a multi-disciplinary team was set up to carry out data cleaning with technical support from WHO.</cleanOps>
    </dataColl>
    <notes/>
    <anlyInfo>
      <respRate/>
      <EstSmpErr/>
      <dataAppr/>
    </anlyInfo>
    <stdyClas/>
    <dataProcessing type=""/>
    <codingInstructions relatedProcesses="" type="">
      <txt/>
      <command formalLanguage=""/>
    </codingInstructions>
  </method>
  <dataAccs>
    <setAvail>
      <accsPlac URI=""/>
      <origArch/>
      <avlStatus/>
      <collSize/>
      <complete/>
      <fileQnty/>
      <notes/>
    </setAvail>
    <useStmt>
      <restrctn/>
      <citReq/>
      <deposReq/>
      <conditions/>
      <disclaimer/>
    </useStmt>
    <notes/>
  </dataAccs>
  <notes/>
</stdyDscr>
<dataDscr>
</dataDscr></codeBook>
